Topic: question....

+ question....
From	Message
Sweetmadness 28 Mar 04, 16:53	+ question.... ok this is something I've just been thinking about for a while and i'm really stuck on it! I can't work out what I think.Basically do you recon animal testing is wrong...not for cosmetic products but for medical research etc...?
Jon 29 Mar 04, 14:23	+ Do animals have souls? Check out the verses in Genesis that state that the animals are for the humans. We can eat the animal... why not test?
james 29 Mar 04, 16:12	+ true, I would say we can test on them. maybe it should all be done in a more humane way though... and why don't we just ban cosmetics anyway. Camp should be living proof that you don't need cosmetics... (emphasis on the should be)
orange 29 Mar 04, 17:52	+ yea we r all made the way god wants us 2 b thefore we dont need cosmetics anyway apart fron jon
Jon 29 Mar 04, 17:56	+ So... are people against testing products on Orange? Say... napalm???? Hydrochloric Acid??? Maybe guns too?
Sweetmadness 29 Mar 04, 18:13	+ yeh i know we can eat them...and they are for us...i see you point there, but aren't we also meant to look after them??
Sweetmadness 29 Mar 04, 18:14	+ yeh i guess if we had no cosmetics at all...then we'd all be in the same boat but some people are really pretty without any make-up anyway so it would be alright for them..and not for everyone else
orange 29 Mar 04, 19:28	+ ok yea im going off jon whats he got against me
Jon 29 Mar 04, 20:48	+ "yea we r all made the way god wants us 2 b thefore we dont need cosmetics anyway apart fron jon" *Jon wonders*
Sweetmadness 29 Mar 04, 21:26	+ that's not a question you wanna ask unless you want people to hurl insults at you...
Sweetmadness 29 Mar 04, 21:33	+ this whole thing is really petty can't we just drop it?!? it takes over the whole website
james 29 Mar 04, 21:50	+ exactly children. I have had quite enough of this... as an "innocent bystander" in this argument my objective opinion is that Orange has had the living daylights whipped out of him by Rich and Jon the young whippersnappers so he should really just back off and go back to his normal posting starting quality topics like he has done on the general message board. I is hoping I is pleasing all da bredren homies! innit
Jonny 29 Mar 04, 23:06	+ maybe he is talking bout me- im also jon! indeed jimmy, blud! 'sup blud! i guess u lot from further up north aint herd that! its basically what's up mate! but instead its " 'sup blud" or maybe even "blaad"! its more of a black fing tho! altho always fun 2 try urself! anyway, i am chatting utter poo!
Rich_Rocks 30 Mar 04, 15:03	+ medical testing on animals is nessecery, for cosmetics it isn't. Unless of course it's on rats where anything goes
Sweetmadness 30 Mar 04, 16:28	+ but is it really nessecary?? Because its not even that reliable because humans work very differently to animals...so a lot of the testing is a waste surely?And you can test on human cells rather than animals
orange 30 Mar 04, 17:18	+ yea
lane 09 Jun 04, 22:36	+ intersting debate! i'm not quite sure what i think on one hand they are for our protecting but then God gave Adam power over them. Beauty isn't skin deep we should remember it's on the inside that counts, but still i see where you are coming from carys. although i think your very pretty, wish i always had the confidence to think i didn't need cosmetics to make me feel confident.